DETROIT TERMINAL RAILROAD COMPANY

v.

PENNSYLVANIA-DETROIT RAILROAD COMPANY AND PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY

Citator

Cited By

• Hackner v. Guar. Tr. Co. of N.Y., 117 F.2d 95 (2d Cir. 1941)
  …service of process is required, it would appear that Eastman’s claim would not relate back ‘to the date of original suit; see Anderson v. Watt, 138 U.S. 694, 11 S.Ct. 449, 34 L.Ed. 1078; Kendrick v. Kendrick, 5 Cir., 16 F. 2d 744, certiorari denied 273 U.S. 758, 47 S.Ct. 472, 71 L.Ed. 877; and Pianta v. H. M. Reich Co., supra. But that issue is not one of jurisdiction, but of time and manner of its exercise. Now under the rules an action once commenced by the filing of a complaint — which is what Eastman’…
• Gertrude P. Fuller v. Volk, 351 F.2d 323 (3d Cir. 1965)
  ….Ed. 893 (1914); Hofheimer v. McIntee, 179 F. 2d 789 (7 Cir.), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 817, 71 S.Ct. 47, 95 L.Ed. 600 (1950); Pianta v. H. M. Reich Co., 77 F. 2d 888 (2 Cir. 1935); Kendrick v. Kendrick, 16 F. 2d 744, 745 (5 Cir. 1926), cert. denied, 273 U.S. 758, 47 S.Ct. 472, 71 L.Ed. 877 (1927); Brictson Mfg. Co. v. Woodrough, 284 F. 484, 487 (8 Cir. 1922); Jacobs v. District Director of Internal Revenue, 217 F.Supp. 104 (S.D.N.Y.1963); Becton v. Greene County Board of Education, 32 F.R.D. 220 (E.D.N.Car.…
• Mrs. Shirley Baker (Truvillion) v. King's Daughters Hosp., 614 F.2d 520 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …As we said in 1926, “[a]n existing suit within the court’s jurisdiction is a prerequisite of an intervention, which is an ancillary proceeding in an already instituted suit”. Kendrick v. Kendrick, 5 Cir. 1926, 16 F. 2d 744, 745, cert. denied, 1927, 273 U.S. 758, 47 S.Ct. 472, 71 L.Ed. 877. See also United States ex rel. Texas Portland Cement Co. v. McCord, 1914, 233 U.S. 157, 163, 34 S.Ct. 550, 553, 58 L.Ed. 893; Fuller v. Volk, 3 Cir. 1965, 351 F. 2d 323, 328; ICC v. Southern R. R., M.D.Ga.1974, 380 F.Su…