MAISON DORIN SOCIETE ANONYME

v.

JOHN W. ARNOLD, DAN H. ARNOLD, ADELAIDE F. ARNOLD, ET AL., ETC.

Citator

Cited By

• In re Applied Logic Corp. v. Gutterman, 576 F.2d 952 (2d Cir. 1978)
  …agreement that the deposit shall be held for the payment of certain creditors, which would be breached if the bank applied the account to pay itself. This principle was applied in Union Trust Co. v. Peck, 16 F. 2d 986, 987-88 (4 Cir.), cert. denied, 273 U.S. 767, 47 S.Ct. 571, 71 L.Ed. 882 (1927). The facts are sparsely stated but the court said: It is, moreover, to be noted that, before and at the time the bank applied these amounts to its own use, it, the bankrupt and the other creditors were conferring…
• Donald Katz in Bankr. of Oakland Foundry Co. of Belleville v. The First Nat'l Bank OF Glen Head, 568 F.2d 964 (2d Cir. 1977)
  …Bank & Trust Co., 18 F. 2d 460, 462 (6 Cir. 1927); Bank of California v. Brainard, 3 F. 2d 3, 4 (9 Cir. 1925); In re Almond-Jones Co., 13 F. 2d 152, 156 [*971] (D.Md.1926), aff’d sub nom. Union Trust Co. v. Peck, 16 F. 2d 986 (4 Cir.), cert. denied, 273 U.S. 767 (1927); cf. Goldstein v. Franklin Square National Bank, 107 F. 2d 393 (2 Cir. 1939) (case remanded for factfinding as to the bank’s intent in accepting deposits and its knowledge of the depositor’s insolvency), on remand, 31 F.Supp. 66 (E.D.N.Y. 194…
• Cornelia H. Maytag v. United States, 493 F.2d 995 (10th Cir. 1974)
  …s, Rogers v. Rogers, 111 N.Y. 228, 18 N.E. 636 (1888) ; In re Peabody’s Will, 277 App.Div. 905, 98 N.Y.S.2d 614 (2d Dept.1950) ; Robertson v. DeBrulatour, 188 N.Y. 301, 80 N.E. 938 (1907) ; Vellacott v. Murphy, 16 F. 2d 700 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 273 U.S. 767, 47 S.Ct. 571, 71 L.Ed. 882 (1927) (dictum) ; Armington v. Meyer, 103 R.I. 211, 236 A. 2d 450 (1967). . 26 U.S.C. § 2041, which provides that a decedent’s gross estate shall include the value of all property subject to a general power of appointmen…