GRAINGER BROTHERS COMPANY

v.

G. AMSINCK AND COMPANY, INC.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Jones, 204 F.2d 745 (7th Cir. 1953)
  …that at no time was this argument advanced to the District Court. . Campbell v. U. S., 6 Cir., 151 F. 2d 605; Hodges v. U. S., 10 Cir., 35 F. 2d 594, modified 10 Cir., 36 F. 2d 356; Cantrell v. U. S., 5 Cir., 15 F. 2d 953, certiorari [*750] denied 273 U.S. 768, 47 S.Ct. 572, 71 L.Ed. 882; Grice v. U. S., 4 Cir., 146 F. 2d 849; U. S. v. Shules, 2 Cir., 65 F. 2d 780; Poetter v. U. S„ 9 Cir., 31 F. 2d 438; Lisansky v. U. S., 4 Cir., 31 F. 2d 846, 67 A.L.R. 67, certiorari denied 270 U.S. 873, 49 S.Ct. 514, 73…
• Shurman v. United States, 219 F.2d 282 (5th Cir. 1955)
  …vidence admissible, namely, that he asserted no proprietary or possessory interest in the car or the marihuana, and therefore cannot complain that the search or seizure was unlawful. Cantrell v. United States, 5 Cir., 15 F. 2d 953, certiorari denied 273 U.S. 768, 47 S.Ct. 572, 71 L.Ed. 882; see also Goldstein v. United States, 316 U.S. 114, at page 121, 62 S.Ct. 1000, 86 L.Ed. 1312, and authorities cited. We hold, therefore, that the court did not err in overruling the motion to suppress. II. VENUE: The…
• Mello v. United States, 66 F.2d 135 (3d Cir. 1933)
  …This court-so held in Chepo v. United States, 46 F.(2d) 70. The question was determined in the same way by the Second Circuit in Connolly v. Medalie, 58 F.(2d) 629; by the Fifth Circuit in Cantrell v. United States, 15 F.(2d) 953, certiorari denied 273 U. S. 768, 47 S. Ct. 572, 71 L. Ed. 882; by the Sixth Circuit in Remus v. United States, 291 F. 501; by the Eighth Circuit in O’Fallon v. United States, 15 F.(2d) 740, certiorari denied 274 U. S. 743, 47 S. Ct. 587, 71 L. Ed. 1321; and by the Ninth Circuit in…