BERNARD B. WEKSLER AND BEVERLY WEKSLER, HIS WIFE, AND MARCUS MORRIS AND HELEN MORRIS, HIS WIFE, INDIVIDUALLY AND REPRESENTING A CLASS OF PERSONS AND TAXPAYERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PETITIONERS,
v.
CITY OF CORAL GABLES, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, AND WILLIAM O. TINDER, RESPONDENTS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court discharged a writ of certiorari, adopting the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, which addressed a question of great public interest concerning the City of Coral Gables.
The Florida Supreme Court held that the District Court of Appeal correctly decided the issue before it.
“We hold that the District Court of Appeal correctly decided the issue before it, and we adopt such as the ruling of this court.”
This quote establishes the Supreme Court's agreement with and adoption of the lower appellate court's decision.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe case originated from a petition by taxpayers against the City of Coral Gables. The District Court of Appeal, Third District, previously decided an…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Question Of Great Public Interest cases and more on FLexlaw
This cause is here on a petition for writ of certiorari supported by certificate of the *845District Court of Appeal, Third District, that its decision is one which involves a question of great public interest. See Section 4(2), Article V, Constitution of Florida, F.S.A.
The factual circumstances, background and questions involved are set forth in the decision of the District Court in City of Coral Gables et al. v. Weksler et al., 164 So.2d 260, decided May 26, 1964.
The writ issued and oral argument by the parties has been heard. We hold that the District Court of Appeal correctly decided the issue before it, and we adopt such as the ruling of this court.
The writ of certiorari is accordingly
Discharged.
DREW, C. J., and ROBERTS, THOR-NAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.
THOMAS, J., concurs in discharging the writ.