TOXAWAY MILLS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Graham and Foster v. Goodcell, 282 U.S. 409 (U.S. 1931)
  …5. 281 U. S. 708, 717; post, pp. —. 1. T. 1446, Cumulative Bulletin,1-2, July-December, 1922, p. 218. See Stange v. United States, ante, p. 270. See Toxaway Mills v. United States, 61 Ct. Cls. 363, reversed on confession of error (March 12,1927), 273 U. S. 781. Section 611 as it appeared in the bill introduced in the House of Representatives provided not only for the retention of the moneys paid, but also that, in similar circumstances, amounts not yet paid might be collected within a year after the new…
• Rabouin v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 195 F.2d 906 (2d Cir. 1952)
  …ond thus did not affect the continuance of the mutual obligations created by the 1946 area agreement. Dingley v. Oler, 117 U.S. 490, 6 S.Ct. 850, 29 L.Ed. 984; Higgins v. California Prune & Apricot Growers, 2 Cir., 16 F. 2d 190, certiorari dismissed 273 U.S. 781, 47 S.Ct. 460, 71 L.Ed. 889; Hasler v. West India S. S. Co., 2 Cir., 212 F. 862. I-t should again be noted — a fact which tends to be overlooked — that it was Rabouin, and not the union, who repudiated the contract, and thus brought on the union’s e…
• Peerless Paper Box MFG. Co. v. Routzahn (N.D. Ohio 1927)
  …New York & Albany Lighterage Co., 273 U. S. 346, 47 S. Ct. 389, 71 L. Ed. 676, February 21, 1927; Toxaway Mills v. United States (certiorari to the Court of Claims, reversed on confession of error, on motion of the Solicitor General, March 14, 1927) 273 U. S. 781, 47 S. Ct. 471, 71 L. Ed. -. In view of the considerations herein, judgment will be entered for the plaintiff against the defendant, and proper decree may be entered to effectuate such judgment.…