HUMBOLDT LAND & CATTLE COMPANY
v.
ROBERT A. ALLEN, STATE ENGINEER OF NEVADA, AND INDIVIDUALLY, ET AL.
HUMBOLDT LAND & CATTLE COMPANY
ROBERT A. ALLEN, STATE ENGINEER OF NEVADA, AND INDIVIDUALLY, ET AL.
274 U.S. 711
Supreme Court of the United States (1927)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
AfMr . Henry A. Guiler, with whom Messrs. Jesse C. Adkins, Albert C. Aiken, and Sterling Carr were on the brief, for appellant.
Mr. George B. Thatcher, with whom Mr. M. A. Diskin was'on the brief, for appellees.
firmed on the authority of Chicago Great Western Railway Co. v. Kendall, 266 U. S. 94, Í00-101.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
California-Oregon Power Co. v. Beaver Portland Cement Co., 73 F.2d 555 (9th Cir. 1934)…e as a whole are intensely interested in its economical, orderly, and inexpensive distribution.” See, too, Ormsby County v. Kearney, 37 Nev. 314, 142 P. 803 (1914); Humboldt Land & Cattle Co. v. Allen, 14 F.(2d) 650, 654 (D. C. Nev., 1926) affirmed 274 U. S. 711, 47 S. Ct. 574, 71 L. Ed. 1314 (1927). Despite the emphasis in some state deci-. sions on the necessity of preserving riparian rights from impairment by judicial or legislative action, it cannot be doubted that in the course of the development of w…
Authorities Cited
- Chicago Great W. Ry. Co. v. Kendall, 266 U.S. 94 (U.S. 1924)