WILL NORRIS
v.
STATE OF LOUISIANA

U.S. | 1927-05-02
No. 794
274 U.S. 719 Supreme Court of the United States (1927) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed on the authority of (1) Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U. S. 312, and (2) Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580, 583; Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Town of Graham, 253 U. S. 193, 195; Seaboard Air Line v. Padgett, 236 U. S. 668, 671.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Frost v. Corp. Comm'n of Okla., 278 U.S. 515 (U.S. 1929)
    …n of the law. The District Court denied both the injunction and the motion to .dismiss; and it dissolved the restraining order. Upon direct appeal by Frost, this Court affirmed- the interlocutory decree per curiam in Frost v. Corporation Commission, 274 U. S. 719, on the authority of Chicago Great Western Ry. Co. v. Kendall, 266 U. S. 94, 100. Thereupon, the facts being stipulated, the case was submitted in the District Court on final hearing to the same judges; and a decree was entered dismissing the bill,…
  • Stephenson v. Binford (S.D. Tex. 1931)
    …takes out a permit, and tho commission thereafter, under authority of the section, attempts unlawfully to confer a permit upon another on less onerous terms, plaintiff may then apply for relief. Frost v. Corporation Commission of State of Oklahoma, 274 U. S. 719, 47 S. Ct. 589, 71 L. Ed. 1323. Besides, this section is in terms made separable from the rest of the act, and, if it is invalid, it, and not the act, will fall. In the same way wo notice the argument of the intervener Beard that the act is [*516]…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw