THOMAS W. PHILLIPS, JR., ET AL., SUBSTITUTED FOR OKLAHOMA NATURAL GAS COMPANY, A CORPORATION,
v.
OKLAHOMA ET AL.
THOMAS W. PHILLIPS, JR., ET AL., SUBSTITUTED FOR OKLAHOMA NATURAL GAS COMPANY, A CORPORATION,
OKLAHOMA ET AL.
275 U.S. 489
Supreme Court of the United States (1927)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The writ of error is dismissed on the authority of § 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937), for lack of jurisdiction. Treating the writ of error as an application for certiorari, the certiorari is denied for want of a substantial Federal question on the authority of Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 551, 569; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
King Mfg. Co. v. City Council of Augusta, 277 U.S. 100 (U.S. 1928)…, 274 U. S. 344, and in Aetna Insurance Co. v. Hyde, 275 U. S. 440, the review was by certiorari. In Aetna Insurance Co. v. Baker, 276 U. S. 628, certiorari was denied. Compare Phillips v. Oklahoma, 274 U. S. 721 (Per Curiam); Phillips v. Okla homa, 275 U. S. 489 (Per Curiam); Missouri v. Public-Service Commission, 275 U. S. 489 (Per Curiam), Mr. Chief Justice Chase explained why the Act should be construed as applying only to statutes and not to municipal ordinances: “ This preference, is givei^ plainly en…1 / 2
Authorities Cited
- Hull v. Burr, 234 U.S. 712 (U.S. 1914)
- Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U.S. 144 (U.S. 1915)
- Clairmont v. United States, 225 U.S. 551 (U.S. 1912)