FORDSON COAL COMPANY
v.
JOHN M. MOORE, SHERIFF

U.S. | 1927-10-31
No. 72
275 U.S. 494 Supreme Court of the United States (1927) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
Pet Curiam.

Pet Curiam.

The writ of error is dismissed on the authority of § 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937), for lack of jurisdiction. Jett Bros. Distilling Company v. City of Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5, 6. Treating the writ of error as an application for certiorari, the certiorari is denied for want of a substantial federal question on the authority of Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Rice v. Sioux City Mem'l Park Cemetery, Inc., 349 U.S. 70 (U.S. 1955)
    …Keller v. Adams-Campbell Co., 264 U. S. 314; Davis v. Currie, 266 U. S. 182; Erie R. Co. v. Kirkendall, 266 U. S. 185; Southern California Edison Co. v. Herminghaus, 275 U. S. 486; Mellon v. McKinley, 275 U. S. 492; Missouri-K.-T. R. Co. v. Texas, 275 U. S. 494; Ellison v. Koswig, 276 U. S. 598; Johnson v. Thornburgh, 276 U. S. 601; Carter Oil Co. v. Eli, 277 U. S. 573; Standard Pipe Line Co. v. Commissioners, 278 U. S. 558; Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v. Johnson, 278 U. S. 576; New York, Chicago & St. L. R.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw