EX PARTE CHARLES A. STUTZMAN
EX PARTE CHARLES A. STUTZMAN
275 U.S. 496
Supreme Court of the United States (1927)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motions of Mr. Charles A. Stutzman for leave to file a petition for habeas corpus in this case and to proceed in forma pauperis therein áre'both denied for the reason, that the. Court, upon examination of the unprinted petition, and papers accompanying it, finds that there are no grounds'upon which the writ of habeas corpus can be issued. The costs already incurred herein by direction of the Court shall be paid by the clerk from the special fund in his custody, as provided in the order of October 29, 1926.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fulsom v. Quaker OIL & GAS Co., 35 F.2d 84 (8th Cir. 1929)…training plaintiffs and their counsel, Lewis C. Lawson, from instituting any further action or suit in any court to cancel the said deed to F. S. Lozier or to recover the said land. It is further alleged that the Supreme Court of the United States (275 U. S. 496, 48 S. Ct. 117, 72 L. Ed. 392) denied a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Oklahoma in said cause. An examination and comparison of the amended petition filed by these plaintiffs in their suit in the state district court with the bill of co…
-
Springer v. Townsend, 336 F.2d 397 (10th Cir. 1964)…ield v. Jack, 78 Okl. 127, 188 P. 1040, cert. denied, Canfield v. Brink, 253 U.S. 493, 40 S.Ct. 586, 64 L.Ed. 1029. . United States v. Goldfeder, supra; Chapman v. Tiger, Okl., 356 P. 2d 571; Tiger v. Lozier, 124 Okl. 260, 256 P. 727, cert. denied, 275 U.S. 496, 48 S.Ct. 117, 72 L.Ed. 392; Molone v. Wamsley, 80 Okl. 181, 195 P. 484. . Kiker v. United States, 10 Cir., 63 F. 2d 957; In re Leaf’s Deed, 180 Okl. 444, 70 P. 2d 75; Silmon v. Rahhal, 178 Okl. 244, 62 P. 2d 501; Haddock v. Shelton, 142 Okl. 202,…