ALASKA PACKERS ASSOCIATION

v.

INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND JOHN PETERSON

Citator

Cited By

• Holland Furniture Co. v. Perkins Glue Co., 277 U.S. 245 (U.S. 1928)
  …o. v. Gould Manufacturing Co., 292 Fed. 596, and the court of appeals for the second circuit, Perkins Glue Co. v. Standard Furniture Co., 287 Fed. 109, had previously held the patent not infringed by the same product.1 This Court granted certiorari. 275 U. S. 512. The patent is entitled “A Patent for Starch Glue and a Method of Making It.” Perkins was the first to make successfully a starch glue suitable for wood veneering and similar. uses. Glue made' from animal substances, known as animal glue, has- long…
• United States v. Magnolia Petroleum Co., 276 U.S. 160 (U.S. 1928)
  …ment of the amount specified, and later brought this suit. The Court of Claims held that the Act of 1924 applied, calculated interest from dates of pay- ‘ ment of the taxes, and gave judgment for $365,799.42. This Court granted a writ of certiorari. 275 U. S. 512. The petitioner maintains that the interest should' be computed according to § 1324(a) of the Act of 1921. Respondent contends that by § 1019 of the Act of 1924 and contemporaneous repeal of § 1324(a), the basis of interest allowances was changed…
• In re Schwendler, 115 F.2d 261 (C.C.P.A. 1940)
  …ell, Sorel and the Dow Chemical Co. Bulletin pages 20 to 26 and 66 showing the use of various fillers) ; the functional statements cannot be considered as differentiating the claims from this prior art. See Holland Furniture Co. v. Perkins Glue Co., 275 U.S. 512 [48 S.Ct. 28, 72 L.Ed. 400], 1928 C.D. 266 (a decision of the United States Supreme Court) : “ Where the only attempt to restrict the claims to avoid the cited art is to claim the indention disclosed by functional statements which in view of the ar…