MARK SKINNER WILLING AND THE NORTHERN TRUST COMPANY, TRUSTEE, ET AL.

v.

CHICAGO AUDITORIUM ASSOCIATION

Citator

Cited By

• Boston Sand & Gravel Co. v. United States, 278 U.S. 41 (U.S. 1928)
  …d be allowed. 19 F. (2d) 744. As there was a conflict of opinion with the Second Circuit dealing with similar language in a special act, New York & Cuba Mail S. S. Co. v. United States, 16 F. (2d) 945, a writ of certiorari was allowed by this Court, 275 U. S. 519. The material words of the Act are that the District Court “ shall have jurisdiction to hear and determine the whole controversy and to enter a judgment or decree for the amount of the legal damages sustained by reason of said collision, if any sha…
• Willing v. Chicago Auditorium Ass'n, 277 U.S. 274 (U.S. 1928)
  …was cognizable in a court of equity as one to remove a cloud upon title; and it reversed the decree with direction to the District Court to hear the evidence and determine the issues involved, 20 F. (2d) 837. This Court granted a writ of certiorari, 275 U. S. 519. Motions by Willing and others to remand the case to the state court had been made in the District Court on the ground that the controversy involved was single and entire as to all the defendants. The motions, which that court denied, were renewed i…
• Consolidation Coal Co. v. W. Md. Ry. Co. (D. Md. 1930)
  …that they place upon the contracts in question a construction different from that for which plaintiff contends ?” Chicago Auditorium Association v. Cramer (D. C.) 8 F.(2d) 998, 1009; Chicago Auditorium Ass’n v. Willing (C. C. A.) 20 F.(2d) 837; Id., 275 U. S. 519, 48 S. Ct. 122, 72 L. Ed. 404; Id., 277 U. S. 274, 48 S. Ct. 507, 72 L. Ed. 880. Taking up, first, plaintiff’s primary claim for relief in equity, which is that the contract was illegal from its inception because in violation of the Interstate Comm…