SOLOMON LAURISDEN AND HARRY KAMPS

v.

LOUIS H. ALEXANDER AND JOHN DOE ALEXANDER

Citator

Cited By

• Dorothea Alice Brandt v. Manuela de Mora Brandt, 138 Fla. 243 (Fla. 1939)
  …eman on Judgments (4th ed.), Sec. 50a; Smith v. Chenault, 48 Texas, 455; Little v. Birdwell, 27 Texas, 688; Hays v. Yarborough, 21 Texas, 487; Wilson & Wheeler v. Nance & Collins, 11 Humph. (Tenn.) 198.” See Davis v. Ivey, 93 Fla. 387, 112 So. 264, 275 U. S. 526, 48 Sup. Ct. 19, 72 L. Ed. 407; State, ex rel., Melbourne State Bank v. Wright, 107 Fla. 178, 145 So. 598. The record having been carefully considered, and briefs and authorities cited by counsel examined, we have concluded that no- error of law or…
• Seaboard Coast Line R.R. Co. v. Hunt, 299 So. 2d 84 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974)
  …to render impeaching testimony admissible. It is also noted that in offering his rebuttal testimony, counsel for appellee stated it was being offered for impeachment. Animus was not mentioned. In Davis v. Ivey, 93 Fla. 387, 112 So. 264, cert. den., 275 U.S. 526, 48 S.Ct. 19, 72 L.Ed. 407, the Florida Supreme Court stated as follows: “We do not mean to say evidence of the interest, bias, prejudice, or motives of a witness can only be shown after a predicate laid by cross-examination of the witness as to th…
• Gustason v. Cal. Tr. Co., 73 F.2d 765 (9th Cir. 1934)
  …Mining Co. v. Rutter, 177 U. S. 505, 507, 20 S. Ct. 726, 44 L. Ed. 864. The test of what constitutes a ease arising under the laws of the United States was stated by this court in Wilson v. Robinson (C. C. A. 9) 16 F.(2d) 431, certiorari denied,, 275 U. S. 526, 48 S. Ct. 19, 72, L. Ed. 407, which was an action to compel the defendants to convey to plaintiff certain lands to. which the defendants had been granted a patent by the United States; plaintiff claiming that she was lawfully entitled to a patent t…