MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY

v.

M. BARRY

Citator

Cited By

• Dang Foo v. DAY, 50 F.2d 116 (2d Cir. 1931)
  …ct, nor, indeed, any reason for supposing that Congress intended to treat Chinese travelers more favorably than tourists of other nationality. This was the construction adopted in Ex parte Wong Gar Wah, 18 F.(2d) 250 (C. C. A. 9), certiorari denied 275 U. S. 529, 48 S. Ct. 21, 72 L. Ed. 409. I agree with it. Believing that Dang Foo was deportable under the Immigration Act of 1924,1 think the order appealed from should be affirmed.…
• YEE SI v. Boyd, 243 F.2d 203 (9th Cir. 1957)
  …llant, who entered the United States for a limited time and then exceeded his stay, has no right to remain. We need refer to but one or two decisions of this Court. In Ex parte Wong Gar Wah, 9 Cir., 1927, 18 F. 2d 250, 251, certiorari denied, 1927, 275 U.S. 529, 48 S.Ct. 21, 72 L.Ed. 409, the Chinese “traveler” was admitted for one year, which had long since expired. Of such a situation, we said: “From the foregoing statement it seems quite apparent that the appellant is in the country without right. As a…