GEORGE WELCH AND JACKOLINE WELCH

v.

WADDELL INVESTMENT COMPANY

Citator

Cited By

• U.S. Healthcare, Inc. v. Blue Cross OF Greater Philadelphia, 898 F.2d 914 (3d Cir. 1990)
  …of extrinsic evidence it imputes to the corporation fraud, deceit, dishonesty, or reprehensible conduct in its business in relation to said goods or product. National Ref. Co. v. Benzo Gas Motor Fuel Co., 20 F. 2d 763, 771 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 275 U.S. 570, 48 S.Ct. 157, 72 L.Ed. 431 (1927). An examination of state court decisions indicates that Pennsylvania law tracks the National Refining distinction. See, e.g., Cosgrove Studio and Camera Shop, Inc. v. Pane, 408 Pa. 314, 319, 182 A. 2d 751 (1962) (…
• Riss v. Ardith L. Anderson, 304 F.2d 188 (8th Cir. 1962)
  …rson defamed which gives the defamation its per se quality. Connell v. A. C. L. Haase & Sons Fish Co., 1923, 302 Mo. 48, 257 S.W. 760, 765; National Refining Co. v. Benzo Gas Motor Fuel Co., 8 Cir., 1927, 20 F. 2d 763, 767, 55 A.L.R. 406, cert. den. 275 U.S. 570, 48 S.Ct. 157, 72 L.Ed. 431. The case last cited states that whether a statement is defamatory per se and whether it applies to the particular plaintiff “are entirely distinct questions, and should not be confused.” With this Missouri law in mind,…
• Kleier Advertising, Inc. v. Premier Pontiac, Inc., 921 F.2d 1036 (10th Cir. 1990)
  …onesty, or reprehensible conduct in its business_” Royer v. Stoody Co., 192 F.Supp. 949, 953 (W.D.Okla.1961) (trade libel case applying Oklahoma law) (quoting National Ref. Co. v. Benzo Gas Motor Fuel Co., 20 F. 2d 763, 771 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 275 U.S. 570, 48 S.Ct. 157, 72 L.Ed. 431 (1927)); see also Nichols, 330 P. 2d at 1045 (language used in a newspaper article which, when given its ordinary, natural, and obvious meaning, meets the elements of the Oklahoma statute is libelous per se and actionable…