ROBERTS ET AL.
v.
DETROIT ET AL.
ROBERTS ET AL.
DETROIT ET AL.
278 U.S. 566
Supreme Court of the United States (1928)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The motion to dismiss is granted on the aúthority of Meyer v. Richmond, 172 U. S. 82. Treating the writ of error as an application for certiorari the same is denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Mittry Bros. Const. Co. v. United States, 75 F.2d 79 (9th Cir. 1934)…each of the following cases were dismissed because of the failure to join all defendants in the appeal, in cases of joint judgments or decrees, or the failure to summon and sever the nonappealing defendants : Journeymen Stone Cutters Ass’n v. U. S., 278 U. S. 566, 49 S. Ct. 78, 73 L. Ed. 509; Missouri State Life Ins. Co. v. Johnson, 288 U. S. 609, 53 S. Ct. 404, 77 L. Ed. 984; Continental & C. T. & S. Bank v. Corey Bros. Const. Co. (C. C. A. 9) 205 F. 282; Babcock v. Norton (C. C. A. 2) 5 F.(2d) 153; Doran v…
-
Pflueger v. Sherman, 75 F.2d 84 (9th Cir. 1935)…S. 225, 230, 9 S. Ct. 58, 60, 32 L. Ed. 437; Hardee v. Wilson, 146 U. S. 179, 180, 183, 13 S. Ct. 39, 36 L. Ed. 933; Inglehart v. Stansbury, 151 U. S. 68, 72, 14 S. Ct. 237, 238, 38. L. Ed. 76; Journeymen Stone Cutters Ass’n et al. v. United States, 278 U. S. 566, 49 S. Ct. 78, 73 L. Ed. 509; Copland v. Waldron (C. C. A. 9) 133 F. 217, 219, appeal dismissed Copeland v. Waldron, 200 U. S. 622, 26 S. Ct. 743, 50 L. Ed. 625; Continental & Commercial Trust & Sav. Bank v. Corey Bros. Const. Co. (C. C. A. 9) 205 F…
-
Boynton v. Hutchinson Gas Co., 292 U.S. 601 (U.S. 1934)…ein is dismissed for the lack of showing of service of summons and severance upon those appellees in the state court who are not parties to the proceedings in this Court. Garcia v. Vela, 216 U.S. 598; Journeymen Stone Cutters Assn. v. United States, 278 U.S. 566; Newton v. Consolidated Gas Co., 264 U.S. 571, 572; 265 U.S. 78, 81, 82.…
Authorities Cited
- Meyer v. Richmond, 172 U.S. 82 (U.S. 1898)