AMERICAN RAILWAY EXPRESS CO.
v.
FLEISCHMANN, MORRISS & CO., INC.; AMERICAN RAILWAY EXPRESS CO. V. RICHMOND HARDWARE CO.; AMERICAN RAILWAY EXPRESS CO. V. G. T. ELLIOTT, INC.; AND AMERICAN RAILWAY EXPRESS CO. V. NEWCOMB
AMERICAN RAILWAY EXPRESS CO.
FLEISCHMANN, MORRISS & CO., INC.; AMERICAN RAILWAY EXPRESS CO. V. RICHMOND HARDWARE CO.; AMERICAN RAILWAY EXPRESS CO. V. G. T. ELLIOTT, INC.; AND AMERICAN RAILWAY EXPRESS CO. V. NEWCOMB
278 U.S. 574
Supreme Court of the United States (1928)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The writs of error are dismissed for want of a substantial federal question on the authority of Wuchter v. Pizzutti, 276 U. S. 13.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Catlin v. United States, 324 U.S. 229 (U.S. 1945)…ate courts, in advance of determination of just compensation, although by local statute “judgments of condemnation,” i. e., of the right to condemn particular property, are reviewable before compensation is found and awarded. Wick v. Superior Court, 278 U. S. 574, 575; Public Service Co. v. Lebanon, 305 U. S. 558, 671; cf. Dieckmann v. United States, 88 F. 2d 902. The foundation of this policy is not in merely technical conceptions of “finality.” It is one against piece [*234] meal litigation. “The case is n…
Authorities Cited
- Wuchter v. Pizzutti, 276 U.S. 13 (U.S. 1928)