YOUNG
v.
STAPLES ET AL.
YOUNG
STAPLES ET AL.
278 U.S. 578
Supreme Court of the United States (1929)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the unprinted record herein submitted, finds that there is no jurisdiction for the appeal, and it is accordingly dismissed on the authority of § 238 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 938). Mr. Henry Young, pro se.
No appearance for appellees.
The costs already incurred herein by direction of the Court shall be paid by the Clerk from the special fund in his custody as provided in the order of October 29, 1926.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
New York v. Frank, 314 U.S. 360 (U.S. 1941)…ers to consolidate under state law without first securing the Commission’s authorization for the consolidation itself. Whether or not this was the necessary interpretation of the consolidation provisions, cf. Snyder v. New York, C. & St. L. R. Co., 278 U. S. 578, nothing in the report of the Commission’s decision suggests that if it was essential, in order to carry out the consolidation under state law, that obligations be “assumed,” then the assumption could be accomplished without compliance with § 20 (a)…1 / 3