BALTUFF
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1929-01-07
No. 609
278 U.S. 579 Supreme Court of the United States (1929) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the unprinted record herein submitted, finds that there is no basis for certiorari, application for which is therefore also denied.

The costs already incurred herein by direction of the Court shall be paid by the Clerk from the special fund in hi§ custody as provided in the order of October 29, 1926.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. State OF Wash., 573 F.2d 1121 (9th Cir. 1978)
    …ustrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). Robinson v. Largent, 419 F. 2d 1327 (3d Cir. 1970) (per curiam); Rosen v. Sugarman, 357 F. 2d 794 (2d Cir. 1966); Baltuff v. United States, 35 F. 2d 507 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 278 U.S. 579, 49 S.Ct. 517, 73 L.Ed. 517 (1929); McColgan v. Lineker, 289 F. 253 (9th Cir. 1923); see 9 Moore’s Federal Practice 1110.13[10], at 187 (2d ed. 1975). Cf., Cord v. Smith, 338 F. 2d 516 (9th Cir. 1964) (disqualification of attorney). We adhere to thi…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw