EMPIRE GAS & FUEL CO. ET AL.
v.
SAUNDERS ET AL.
EMPIRE GAS & FUEL CO. ET AL.
SAUNDERS ET AL.
278 U.S. 581
Supreme Court of the United States (1929)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The Court finds that the writ of certiorari heretofore issued in this case was improvidently granted, and it is dismissed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rice v. Sioux City Mem'l Park Cemetery, Inc., 349 U.S. 70 (U.S. 1955)…76 U. S. 601; Carter Oil Co. v. Eli, 277 U. S. 573; Standard Pipe Line Co. v. Commissioners, 278 U. S. 558; Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v. Johnson, 278 U. S. 576; New York, Chicago & St. L. R. Co. v. Granfell, ibid.; Empire Gas & Fuel Co. v. Saunders, 278 U. S. 581; Virginian R. Co. v. Kirk, 278 U. S. 582; Wallace v. Motor Products Corp., 279 U. S. 859; Sutter v. Midland Valley R. Co., 280 U. S. 521; Anglo & London-Paris Nat. Bank v. Consolidated Nat. Bank, 280 U. S. 526; Gulf, Mobile & N. R. Co. v. Williams,…
-
Good Hope Refineries, Inc. v. Belia R. Benavides, 602 F.2d 998 (1st Cir. 1979)…od may be fairly analogized to exercising an option to extend an option to purchase property. There is precedent for so viewing the function of a delay rental payment. Empire Gas & Fuel Co. v. Saunders, 22 F. 2d 733 (5th Cir. 1927), cert. dismissed, 278 U.S. 581, 49 S.Ct. 184, 73 L.Ed. 518 (1928). Thus, appellant would have us read section 11(e) as providing an automatic extension of an option contract for a period of up to 60 days from the date of adjudication. We cannot do so. Although not a model of cla…