DOUGLAS

v.

NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN AND HARTFORD R. R. CO.

Citator

Cited By

• N.Y. Cent. R.R. Co. v. Johnson, 279 U.S. 310 (U.S. 1929)
  …ved to the District Court for Western Missouri, where they were tried together. Judgment there on a verdict for respondents was affirmed. by the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. 27 F. (2d) 699. This Court granted certiorari October 15, 1928, 278 U. S. 590, the order allowing the writ directing [*313] that the argument in this Court “ be limited to the question whether the alleged misconduct of. counsel for the plaintiffs in their arguments to the jury was so unfairly prejudicial to the defendant as t…
• Louisville & Nashville R.R. Co. v. Chatters, 279 U.S. 320 (U.S. 1929)
  …ion was overruled. 17 F. (2d). 305. On the trial the district court gave judgment on a verdict for respondent against both petitioners, which was affirmed by the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. 26 F. (2d) 403. This Court granted certiorari. 278 U. S. 590. The Southern alone seeks a review of the order overruling its exception to the jurisdiction. The Louisville & Nashville assigns as error the refusal of the trial court to give a requested instruction to the jury. Both petitioners raise for conside…
• Pampanga Sugar Mills v. Trinidad, 279 U.S. 211 (U.S. 1929)
  …an opinion in which he stated that he still adhered to his original belief and that he changed his vote solely in order to break the deadlock, and thereby enable the corporation to apply to this Court for a review. A writ of certiorari was granted. 278 U. S. 590. As the amount in controversy exceeds $25,000, there is jurisdiction under § 7 of the Act of February 13,1925,43 Stat. 936, 940. We are of opinion that the judgment should be affirmed. The corporation manufactured and sold the sugar. Section 1459 d…