MARYLAND CASUALTY CO.
v.
JONES

U.S. | 1928-12-10
No. 524
278 U.S. 596 Supreme Court of the United States (1928) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Standard OIL Co. v. City OF Marysville, 279 U.S. 582 (U.S. 1929)
    …Mr. Justice Stone delivered the opinion of the Court. This case is here on certiorari, 278 U. S. 596, to review a judgment of the Court pf Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, reversing a decree of the District Court for Kansas which enjoined the enforcement of an ordinance of respondent, the City of Marysville, as in violation of the Fourteenth Amendme…
  • Md. Cas. Co. v. Jones, 279 U.S. 792 (U.S. 1929)
    …s. 27 F. (2d) 521. The case is here for limited review, on the question whether that court erred in failing to review the rulings of the District Court in the progress of the trial, excepted to at the time and duly presented by a bill of exceptions. 278 U. S. 596. In. the progress of the trial the court made various rul-. ings adverse to the defendant in respect to the admission and exclusion of evidence; denied a motion for nonsuit made by the defendant at the close of the evidence, based, on. the asserted…
  • …for respondent in accordance with the rescript of the higher court. The judgment of. the superior court was thus, under local practice, a final decision of the highest court of the state in which the decision could be had and the writ of certiorari, 278 U. S. 596, was properly directed to that court. See Davis v. Cohen Co., 268 U. S. 638, 639; Myers v. International Trust Co., 273 U. S. 380, 381. Petitioner offered several defenses to the suit in the state court, only two of which involve federal questions,…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw