SAMPERE
v.
NEW ORLEANS
SAMPERE
NEW ORLEANS
279 U.S. 812
Supreme Court of the United States (1929)
Caution
Cited by 62 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
Affirmed on the authority of (1) Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co., 272 U. S. 365; Zahn v. Board of Public Works, 274 U. S. 325; Gorieb v. Fox, 274 U. S. 603; (2) Sperry Hutchison Co. v. Rhodes, 220 U. S. 502, 505; Williams v. Walsh, 222 U. S. 415, 420.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (31 total)
-
United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36 (U.S. 1950)…; Heitmuller v. Stokes, 256 U. S. 359; Atherton Mills v. Johnston, 259 U. S. 13; Brownlow v. Schwartz, 261 U. S. 216; Alejandrino v. Quezon, 271 U. S. 528; Norwegian Nitrogen Co. v. Tariff Commission, 274 U. S. 106; United States v. Anchor Coal Co., 279 U. S. 812; Sprunt & Son v. United States, 281 U. S. 249; Hargis v. Bradford, 283 U. S. 781; Mahan v. Hume, 287 U. S. 575; Railroad Commission of Texas v. Macmillan, 287 U. S. 576; Coyne v. Prouty, 289 U. S. 704; First Union Trust & Savings Bank v. Consumers C…
-
Bank of Marin v. England in Bankruptcy, 385 U.S. 99 (U.S. 1966)…ank v. Mouses, 186 U. S. 181. An unbroken line of eases establishes the rule that controversy as to costs alone does not salvage an otherwise moot case. See, e. g., Walling v. Reuter Co., 321 U. S. 671, 677 (1944); United States v. Anchor Coal Co., 279 U. S. 812 (1929); Alejandrino v. Quezon, 271 U. S. 528, 533-536 (1926); Brownlow v. Schwartz, 261 U. S. 216 (1923); Heitmuller v. Stokes, 256 U. S. 359, 362-363 (1921); Robertson & Kirkham, Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court [*112] of the United States § 274 (…
-
Duke Power Co. v. Greenwood Cnty., 299 U.S. 259 (U.S. 1936)…e below and to remand the cause with directions to dismiss. See United States v. Hamburg-American Co., 239 U. S. 466, 475, 478; Atherton Mills v. Johnston, 259 U. S. 13, 16; Brownlow v. Schwartz, 261 U. S. 216, 218; United States v. Anchor Coal Co., 279 U. S. 812. If it appears that supervening facts require a retrial in the light of a [*268] changed situation, the appropriate action of the appellate court is to vacate the decree which has been entered and revest the court below with jurisdiction of the caus…
Previewing 3 of 31 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Vill. OF Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co., 272 U.S. 365 (U.S. 1926)
- Gorieb v. FOX, 274 U.S. 603 (U.S. 1927)
- Zahn v. Bd. OF Pub. Works, 274 U.S. 325 (U.S. 1927)
- Williams v. Walsh, 222 U.S. 415 (U.S. 1912)
- Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. Rhodes, 220 U.S. 502 (U.S. 1911)