NEW JERSEY
v.
STATE OF NEW YORK ET AL.
NEW JERSEY
STATE OF NEW YORK ET AL.
279 U.S. 823
Supreme Court of the United States (1929)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
Motion for leave to file a bill of complaint herein is granted, and process is ordered to issue, returnable on Monday, May 27 next.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
South Carolina v. North Carolina, 558 U.S. 256 (U.S. 2010)…, such as the one before us now, where the States were seeking equitable apportionment of water resources. See, e. g., Arizona v. California, 460 U. S. 605, 608, n. 1 (1988); Texas v. New Mexico, 343 U. S. 932 (1952); New Jersey v. City of New York, 279 U. S. 823 (1929) (per curiam). It is, thus, not a novel proposition to accord party status to a citizen in an original action between States. This Court likewise has granted leave, under appropriate circumstances, for nonstate entities to intervene as part…
-
New Jersey v. N.Y. City, 290 U.S. 237 (U.S. 1933)…Decree, announced by Mr. Justice Butler. Leave having been granted, 279 U.S. 823, the State of New Jersey, May 20, 1929, filed its bill of complaint against the City of New York and prayed that the City be enjoined from dumping-garbage or-other noxious, [*238] offensive or injurious matter into the ocean or other waters of the U…