NEW JERSEY

v.

CITY OF NEW YORK

Citator

Cited By

• In re Faerstein v. Moore, 58 F.2d 942 (9th Cir. 1932)
  …so, In re Greek Mfg. Co. (D. C.) 164 F. 211; In re Marks (D. C.) 171 F. 281; In re Avoca Silk Co. (D. C.) 241 F. 607; Matter of J. W. Renshaw’s Sons, Bankrupt (D. C.) 3 F.(2d) 75; Matter of Wm. L. David (C. C. A.) 33 F.(2d) 748; David v. Hubbard, 280 U. S. 514, 50 S. Ct. 19, 74 L. Ed. 585. That the procedure of review is plainly defined and power limited in the interest of regularity and for the common good is clearly stated by Judge Sawtelle of this court, sitting as District Judge, in Re Octave Mining…
• In re Chelsea Hotel Corp., 241 F.2d 846 (3d Cir. 1957)
  …sub. c, 11 U.S.C.A. § 67, sub. c, of the Bankruptcy Act the order of a referee is reviewable by the District Court and its jurisdiction to review such orders is exclusive. In re David, 3 Cir., 1929, 33 F. 2d 748, certiorari denied David v. Hubbard, 280 U.S. 514, 50 S.Ct. 19, 74 L.Ed. 585; In re Miller, 6 Cir., 1940, 111 F. 2d 28; California State Board of Equalization v. Sampsell, 9 Cir., 1952, 196 F. 2d 252. See MacNeil v. Gargill, 1 Cir., 1956, 231 F. 2d 33, certiorari denied 352 U.S. 833, 77 S.Ct. 50, 1…
• New Jersey v. N.Y. City, 290 U.S. 237 (U.S. 1933)
  …urious matter into the ocean or other waters of the United States off the coast of New Jersey and from otherwise polluting its waters and its beaches. Defendant answered, raising issues of fact. The Court appointed Edward K. Campbell special master, 280 U.S. 514, who took the evidence and reported the same, together with his findings of fact, conclusions of law and recommendations for a decree. He found that defendant had created and was continuing to create a public nuisance upon beaches and other propert…