KING

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Rice v. Sioux City Mem'l Park Cemetery, Inc., 349 U.S. 70 (U.S. 1955)
  …ohnson, 278 U. S. 576; New York, Chicago & St. L. R. Co. v. Granfell, ibid.; Empire Gas & Fuel Co. v. Saunders, 278 U. S. 581; Virginian R. Co. v. Kirk, 278 U. S. 582; Wallace v. Motor Products Corp., 279 U. S. 859; Sutter v. Midland Valley R. Co., 280 U. S. 521; Anglo & London-Paris Nat. Bank v. Consolidated Nat. Bank, 280 U. S. 526; Gulf, Mobile & N. R. Co. v. Williams, ibid.; Wisconsin Electric Co. v. Dumore Co., 282 U. S. 813; Adam v. New York Trust Co., 282 U. S. 814; Director of Lands v. Villa-Abrill…
• Hill v. United States, 261 F.2d 483 (9th Cir. 1958)
  …determine whether there are two offenses or only one is whether each provision requires proof of an additional fact which the other does not.” See also Levin v. United States, 9 Cir., 5 F. 2d 598; King v. United States, 9 Cir., 31 F. 2d 17, affirmed 280 U.S. 521, 50 S.Ct. 65, 74 L.Ed. 590; Ross v. United States, 9 Cir. 103 F. 2d 600; United Cigar [*490] Whelan Stores Corp. v. United States, 9 Cir., 113 F. 2d 340. In this case conviction of the appellant for concealing and facilitating the concealment and t…
• Ross v. United States, 103 F.2d 600 (9th Cir. 1939)
  …F. 2d 399, 404; Burton v. United States, 202 U.S. 344, 26 S.Ct. 688, 50 L.Ed. 1057, 6 Ann.Cas. 362; and Gavieres v. United States, 220 U.S. 338, 31 S.Ct. 421, 55 L.Ed. 489; and by this court in King v. United States, 9 Cir., 31 F. 2d 17, affirmed in 280 U.S. 521, 50 S.Ct. 65, 74 L.Ed. 590. Our opinion in the King case cites the controlling authorities and they need not be repeated here. It may be well to add, however, that we specifically declined to follow Cain v. United States, supra. In view of the late…

Authorities Cited

• Albrecht v. United States, 273 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1927)