HUNTER
v.
BAASH-ROSS TOOL CO. ET AL.

U.S. | 1930-01-13
No. 545
280 U.S. 531 Supreme Court of the United States (1930) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied, for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the unprinted record herein submitted, finds that there is no properly presented substantial federal question. The petition for writ of certiorari is therefore also denied. The costs already incurred herein shall be paid by the Clerk as provided in the order of October 29, 1926.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Holmes v. City of Fayetteville, 281 U.S. 700 (U.S. 1930)
    …Per Curiam: The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Yamhill Electric Co. v. City of McMinnville, 280 U. S. 531; Wabash R. R. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29; Erie R. R. Co. v. Solomon, 237 U. S. 427; Zucht v. King, 260 U. S. 174; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182; C. A. King Co. v. Horton, 276 U. S. 600; Bank of Indianola v. Miller, 276 U. S. 605; Roe…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw