TEXAS & PACIFIC R. CO.
v.
GUIDRY, ADMINISTRATRIX
TEXAS & PACIFIC R. CO.
GUIDRY, ADMINISTRATRIX
280 U.S. 531
Supreme Court of the United States (1930)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
Judgment affirmed. Western & Atlantic R. R. v. Hughes, Administratrix, 278 U. S. 496, 498.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Holmes v. City of Fayetteville, 281 U.S. 700 (U.S. 1930)…Per Curiam: The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Yamhill Electric Co. v. City of McMinnville, 280 U. S. 531; Wabash R. R. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29; Erie R. R. Co. v. Solomon, 237 U. S. 427; Zucht v. King, 260 U. S. 174; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182; C. A. King Co. v. Horton, 276 U. S. 600; Bank of Indianola v. Miller, 276 U. S. 605; Roe…
Authorities Cited
- W. & Atl. R.R. v. Hughes, 278 U.S. 496 (U.S. 1929)