DANOVITZ
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1929-11-04
No. 424
280 U.S. 548 Supreme Court of the United States (1929) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Danovitz v. United States, 281 U.S. 389 (U.S. 1930)
    …s affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals, 34 F. (2d) 30. A writ of certiorari was granted [*396] by this Court but confined to the single question whether the property seized is forfeitable under Sec. 25, Title II, of the National Prohibition Act. 280 U. S. 548. The property in question was containers, barrels, bottles, corks, labels, cartons, &c. By the statute it is “ unlawful to have or possess any liquor or property designed for the manufacture of liquor intended for use in violating this chapter or w…
  • Campbell v. W. H. Long & Co., 281 U.S. 610 (U.S. 1930)
    …with the provisions of § 9 of the Act, considered in the Galeno case. In No. 445 an injunction was issued by the trial court; the decree was affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 34 F. (2d) 645; and we granted certiorari, 280 U. S. 548. Injunctions were granted by the trial court also in Nos. 510 and 511, 30 F. (2d) 400 5; appeals were taken to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit; and these cases are here on certificates from that, court. Among the “ articles ” enu…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw