MCCLOSKEY
v.
TOLEDO PRESSED STEEL CO.

U.S. | 1929-10-14
No. 101
280 U.S. 556 Supreme Court of the United States (1929) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Michael and Janet Falley, 489 F.2d 33 (2d Cir. 1973)
    …passports are private documents, he would still have to face the fact [*42] that he does not “own” his wife’s passport and therefore is in no position to withhold it from the court. See Fuller v. United States, 31 F. 2d 747 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 280 U.S. 556, 50 S.Ct. 17, 74 L.Ed. 612 (1929).…
  • Nelson v. United States (two cases), 208 F.2d 505 (D.C. Cir. 1953)
    …0 F. 2d 363, where it had been voluntarily introduced in proceedings by a complaining owner; (3) state officials who obtained it either entirely through their own efforts, Fuller v. United States, 2 Cir., 1929, 31 F. 2d 747, certiorari denied, 1929, 280 U.S. 556, 50 S.Ct. 17, 74 L.Ed. 612, or as a result of its being filed as a public record, Davis v. United States, 5 Cir., 1943, 138 F. 2d 406, certiorari denied, 1944, 321 U.S. 775, 64 S.Ct. 616, 88 L.Ed. 1069; and (4) a federal prison official who obtained…
  • United States v. Amorosa, 167 F.2d 596 (3d Cir. 1948)
    …nger prints. Cf. United States v. Kelly, 2 Cir., 55 F. 2d 67, 70, 83 A.L.R. 122. The government rightfully had possession of the pictures and used them for a proper evidential purpose. Fuller v. United States, 2 Cir., 31 F. 2d 747, certiorari denied 280 U.S. 556, 50 S.Ct. 17, 74 L.Ed. 612, well illustrates the thought. In that case papers had been subpoenaed by state authorities for use in a state investigation. The federal government, then subpoenaed them from the state for federal prosecution purposes. To…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw