MONTGOMERY COTTON MILLS, INC.,

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Pepper Bros., 142 F.2d 340 (3d Cir. 1944)
  …imilar construction should be placed upon the same phraseology when used in subsection (j). United States v. Cooper Corp., 1941, 312 U.S. 600, 606, 607, 61 S.Ct. 742, 85 L.Ed. 1071; Lewellyn v. Harbison, 3 Cir., 1929, 31 F. 2d 740, certiorari denied 280 U.S. 560, 50 S.Ct. 18, 74 L.Ed. 615. We conclude that subsection (j) did not repeal any of the provisions of Maximum Price Regulation 269. Under the terms of subsection (j) provisions for standards and grades are not to be included in a regulation unless ce…
• Commissioner OF Internal Revenue v. Est. of Ellis Branson Ridgway, 291 F.2d 257 (3d Cir. 1961)
  …American Wire Weavers’ Protective Ass’n, D.C. N.D.Ohio, 1957, 159 F.Supp. 425 (terms “labor organization,” “craft,” “trade,” and “class” in 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(b) (4) (D). In Lewellyn v. Harbison, 3 Cir., 31 F. 2d 740, 742, certiorari denied, 1929, 280 U.S. 560, 50 S.Ct. 18, 74 L.Ed. 615, this court construed the phrase “distribution made” to have the same meaning where used in a section of the statute that both imposed a tax and granted an exception to such a tax, and said: “When the same word or phrase i…
• Brown v. Nat'l Hwy. Traffic Safety Admin., 673 F.2d 544 (D.C. Cir. 1982)
  …tates v. Nunez, 573 F. 2d 769, 771 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 930, 98 S.Ct. 2828, 56 L.Ed.2d 774 (1978), quoting Meyer v. United States, 175 F. 2d 45, 47 (2d Cir. 1949), quoting Lewellyn v. Harbison, 31 F. 2d 740, 742 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 280 U.S. 560, 50 S.Ct. 18, 74 L.Ed. 615 (1929). The inference of identical meaning is less compelling when a word or phrase appears in discrete sections of an act. See Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. EPA. 673 F. 2d 400, 403 n.10 (D.C.Cir. 1982).…