SHICK

v.

GOODMAN, TRUSTEE

Citator

Cited By

• Childs v. United States Bd. OF Parole, 511 F.2d 1270 (D.C. Cir. 1974)
  …diction pertains, and that section 1361, the mandamus statute, did not confer jurisdiction becase “ ‘the office of mandamus is to enforce and not establish a right.’ United States v. Mellon, 59 U.S.App.D.C. 24, 32 F. 2d 415 (1929), certiorari denied 280 U.S. 561, 50 S.Ct. 19, 74 L.Ed. 616; Stowell v. Deming, 57 App.D.C. 223, 19 F. 2d 697 (1927) certiorari denied 275 U.S. 531, 48 S.Ct. 28, 72 L.Ed. 410,” 3 and “to obtain mandamus relief the right sought to be enforced must be sufficiently clear and definite…
• In re Ashe v. United States, 669 F.2d 105 (3d Cir. 1982)
  …rdinary judgment liens. See In re Fell, 18 F.Supp. 989, 991 (E.D.Pa. 1937); Nogi v. Greenwood, 1 F.Supp. 60, 62-63 (M.D.Pa.1932); In re Albright, 18 F. 2d 591, 592 (E.D.Pa.1927), aff’d sub nom. Shick v. Goodman, 33 F. 2d 291 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 280 U.S. 561, 50 S.Ct. 19, 74 L.Ed. 616 (1929); Greenberger v. Schwartz, 261 Pa. 265, 104 A. 573 (1918); 4 Collier on Bankruptcy 116, ¶ 67.08 n.1 (14th ed. 1978). Given that background, and in the absence of any indication in the legislative history of the Ban…