UNIVERSAL INSURANCE CO.

v.

GULF REFINING CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Moore-McCORMACK Lines, Inc. v. THE Tank S.S. Esso Camden, 244 F.2d 198 (2d Cir. 1957)
  …ling of the district court was clearly correct. The 21/z% settling agent’s commission which the Halsted advanced is also a well established item of recovery. See Gulf Refining Co. v. Universal Ins. Co., 2 Cir., 1929, 32 F. 2d 555, certiorari denied 280 U.S. 584, 50 S.Ct. 35, 74 L.Ed. 634. As the general average disbursements were advanced for the benefit of all interests in and aboard the ship, it became necessary thereafter to have a general average adjustment to apportion the loss between hull and cargo…
• Hooper v. United States, 216 F.2d 684 (10th Cir. 1954)
  …assign as error any portion of the charge or omission therefrom unless he objects thereto * * *, stating distinctly the matter to which he objects and the grounds of his objection.” . Murphy v. United States, 3 Cir., 33 F. 2d 896, certiorari denied 280 U.S. 584, 50 S.Ct. 35, 74 L.Ed. 634; Colbeck v. United States, 7 Cir., 10 F. 2d 401, 404, certiorari denied 271 U.S. 662, 46 S.Ct. 474, 70 L.Ed. 1138; Freeman v. United States, 9 Cir., 158 F. 2d 891, 896, certiorari denied 331 U.S. 805, 67 S.Ct. 1187, 91 L.E…