OSTRANDER-SEYMOUR CO.
v.
GRAND RAPIDS ELECTROTYPE CO.
OSTRANDER-SEYMOUR CO.
GRAND RAPIDS ELECTROTYPE CO.
280 U.S. 585
Supreme Court of the United States (1929)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jordan v. United States Dep't OF Just., 591 F.2d 753 (D.C. Cir. 1978)…9, 90 Stat. 1241. . K. Davis, Administrative Law in the Seventies, § 3A.00-1 (Cumulative Supp.1977) at 23, . E. g., W. A. Sheaffer Pen Co. v. Lucas, 59 App.D.C. 323, 41 F. 2d 117 (1930); Apfel v. Mellon, 59 App.D.C. 94, 33 F. 2d 805, cert. denied, 280 U.S. 585, 50 S.Ct. 35, 74 L.Ed. 634 (1929); Joy Floral Co. v. CIR, 58 App.D.C. 277, 29 F. 2d 865 (1929). See District of Columbia v. Orleans, 132 U.S.App.D.C. 139, 406 F. 2d 957 (1968). . “It is to be observed that acts in pari materia are to be construed t…