ALBRECHT ET AL.

v.

LOHSE ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Sunbeam Gold Mines Co., 95 F.2d 699 (9th Cir. 1938)
  …ster Repeating Arms Co. v. Olmsted, 7 Cir., 203 F. 493, 494; National Picture Theatres, Inc. v. Foundation Film [*701] Corp., 2 Cir., 266 F. 208, 210; Wheeling & L. E. R. Co. v. Pittsburgh & W. V. R. Co., 6 Cir., 33 F. 2d 390, 393, certiorari denied 280 U.S. 593, 50 S.Ct. 40, 74 L.Ed. 640. See, also, Hanover Star Mill Co. v. Allen & Wheeler Co., 7 Cir., 208 F. 513, 523, L.R.A.1916D, 136, and City of Covington, Ky. v. Cincinnati, N. & C. R. Co., 6 Cir., 71 F. 2d 117, 110, certiorari denied 293 U.S. 612, 55 S…
• Cruzado v. People of Puerto RICO, 210 F.2d 789 (1st Cir. 1954)
  …is represented by counsel, we do not see why counsel, in his presence and on his behalf, may not make an effective waiver of this privilege. It was so held in Fukunaga v. Territory of Hawaii, C.A. 9 Cir., 1929, 33 F. 2d 396, certiorari denied 1929, 280 U.S. 593, 50 S.Ct. 39, 74 L.Ed. 641. Appellant suggests that the authority of this case has been weakened by the subsequent opinion in Johnson v. Zerbst, 1938, 304 U.S. 458, 58 S.Ct. 1019, 82 L.Ed. 1461, which involved a waiver of the constitutional right t…
• In re Fed. Photo Engraving Corp. Ex parte Massey, 54 F.2d 628 (2d Cir. 1931)
  …feree has denied relief to the receiver or entered a so-called “turn-over order” against the appellant. In re Bussell (C. C. A.) 101 F. 248; In re Rose Shoe Mfg. Co. (C. C. A.) 168 F. 39; Pearson v. Higgins (C. C. A.) 34 F.(2d) 27, certiorari denied 280 U. S. 593, 50 S. Ct. 39, 74 L. Ed. 641; Seattle Garb Exchange v. Knight (C. C. A.) 46 F.(2d) 34. Because no order of this court has been obtained allowing the present appeal, and such an order is a condition of our right to review the order of the District…