HATMAKER

v.

DRY MILK CO.

Citator

Cited By

• United States Potash Co. v. McNUTT, 70 F.2d 126 (10th Cir. 1934)
  …entitled. Slocum v. New York Life Ins. Co., 228 U. S. 364, 33 S. Ct. 523, 57 L. Ed. 879, Ann. Cas. 1914D, 1029. But we are not barred from an order of remittitur [St. Paul F. & M. Ins. Co. v. Eldracher (C. C. A. 8) 33 F.(2d) 675, certiorari denied 280 U. S. 604, 50 S. Ct. 86, 74 L. Ed. 649] if the excess of the judgment is merely a matter of computation, and does not involve a determination of a disputed question of fact, as in Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co., 287 U. S. 474, 53 S. Ct. 252, 77 L.…
• Moist Cold Refrigerator Co., Inc. v. LOU Johnson Co., Inc., 217 F.2d 39 (9th Cir. 1954)
  …4 F. 596. . Dobson v. Lees, 137 U.S. 258, 11 S.Ct. 71, 34 L.Ed. 652; Union Switch & Signal Co. v. Louisville Frog, etc., Co., 6 Cir., 73 F. 2d 550; Hatmaker v. Dry Milk Co., D. C., 29 F. 2d 918, 921, affirmed 2 Cir., 34 F. 2d 609, certiorari denied 280 U.S. 604, 50 S.Ct. 86, 74 L.Ed. 649; Grand Rapids Show Case Co. v. Baker, 6 Cir., 216 F. 341. . Parker and Whipple Co. v. Yale Lock Co., 123 U.S. 87, 8 S.Ct. 38, 31 L.Ed. 100; Coon v. Wilson, 113 U.S. 268, 5 S.Ct. 537, 28 L.Ed. 963; Russell v. Dodge, 93 U.S…
• Union Indem. Co. v. Home Tr. Co., 64 F.2d 906 (8th Cir. 1933)
  …the amount of the loss and a reasonable attorney’s fee; and the court shall enter judgment for the aggregate sum found in the verdict.” As was said by this court in St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Eldracher, 33 F.(2d) 675, 683 (certiorari denied 280 U. S. 604, 50 S. Ct. 86, 74 L. Ed. 649): “The supreme court of Missouri has held that the phrase ‘vexations refusal to pay’ means without reasonable or prebable cause or excuse; that vexatious refusal is. not to be deduced from the mere fact that upon trial t…

  ← 1 / 2 →