LANGNES
v.
GREEN
LANGNES
GREEN
281 U.S. 708
Supreme Court of the United States (1930)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Graham and Foster v. Goodcell, 282 U.S. 409 (U.S. 1931)…ted States for the Southern District of California. The judgment entered in favor of the petitioners by the District Court was reversed by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 35 Fed. (2d) 586. This Court granted a writ of certiorari, 281 U. S. 708. There are variations in the other cases, but the determining features are the same. A claim in abatement was filed and collection was delayed; the collection was made after the statute of limitations had run, and before the enactment of the Act of…1 / 2
-
Uravic v. F. Jarka Co., 282 U.S. 234 (U.S. 1931)…ose of the plaintiff’s case the complaint was dismissed upon the merits and the decision was affirmed by the Court of Appeals, 252 N. Y. 530, on the authority of Resigno v. F. Jarka Co., 248 N. Y. 225. A writ of certiorari was granted by this Court, 281 U. S. 708, because there is involved an important question as to the applicability of the Jones Act of 1915, c. 153, as amended by the Act of June 5, 1920, c. 250, § 33, 41 Stat. 988, 1007; U. S. Code, Title 46, § 688. The action was for causing the death- o…
-
In re Liverpool (S.D.N.Y. 1931)…re is still uncertainty regarding the status of unfiled claims [The Agwisun (D. C.) 20 F. (2d) 975], and'claims which have not sub [*948] mitted to the admiralty jurisdiction [The Aloha (C. C. A.) 35 F.(2d) 447, certiorari granted, Langnes V. Green, 281 U. S. 708, 50 S. Ct. 246; 74 L. Ed. 1131]. The cases cited by the claimants are plainly distinguishable. In The Titanic (C. C. A.) 204 F. 260, the injunction was lifted to permit a death claimant to commence an action in the state court in order to avoid th…