CHOTEAU
v.
LUCAS, COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

U.S. | 1930-05-19
No. 815
281 U.S. 714 Supreme Court of the United States (1930) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Smith v. Magic City Kennel Club, 282 U.S. 784 (U.S. 1931)
    …decree of the District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, 21 F. (2d) 366, which held patents No. 1,379,224 and No. 1,507,440 to be valid and infringed. In view of this conflict, this Court granted a writ of certiorari in the instant case. 281 U. S. 714. These patents were also before the District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, in Smith v. Springdale Amusement Park, where the bill of complaint was dismissed for want of infringement, 39 F. (2d) 92, and the decree was affirmed by the Circu…
  • Choteau v. Burnet, 283 U.S. 691 (U.S. 1931)
    …from the effect of § 213 (a) of the Revenue Act of 1918. Affirmed. c. 3572, 34 Stat. 539. § 3, Act of 1906, supra. 45 Stat. 1478. § 3, Act of 1906, supra. § 4, First and Second, and § 6, Act of 1906, supra. 14 B. T. A. 1254. 38 F. (2d) 976. 281 U. S. 714. 40 Stat. 1062. 40 Stat. 1065. See United States v. Nice, 241 U. S. 591, 598; United States v. Waller, 243 U. S. 452, 459; McCurdy v. United States, 246 U. S. 263, 269; Shaw v. Oil Corp., 276 U. S. 575, 579. Section. 4 of the Act of February 27,…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw