CAPTAIN H. B. YOUNG AND THE CITY OF MIAMI, APPELLANTS,

v.

THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI, A NATIONAL BANKING CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• McCRAE v. State, 395 So. 2d 1145 (Fla. 1980)
  …excluded merely because it points to commission of a separate crime, unless its sole relevance is to point up bad character or the criminal propensity of an accused. Mackiewicz v. State, 114 So. 2d 684 (Fla.1959); Williams v. State; Jordan v. State, 171 So. 2d 418 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965). As appellant correctly notes, the testimony of Edith Veal and Muriel Bergner did not present evidence of another crime, thereby suggesting appellant’s criminal propensities. Because appellant has not suggested any other specific…
• Green v. State, 190 So. 2d 42 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966)
  …collateral crime or “similar fact” evidence has been held inadmissible, such as in Norris v. State, Fla. App.1963, 158 So. 2d 803; State v. Norris, Fla.1964, 168 So. 2d 541; Williams v. State, Fla.1962, 143 So. 2d 484; Jordan v. State, Fla.App.1965, 171 So. 2d 418; Hooper v. State, supra; cf. Swain v. State, Fla.App. 1965, 172 So. 2d 3; it would undoubtedly-have been held inadmissible prior to Williams. [*47] The same line of demarcation between admissibility and non-admissibility of such “similar fact” evide…
• Wilson v. State, 294 So. 2d 327 (Fla. 1974)
  …156 Fla. 481, 23 So. 2d 558 (1945); Ailer v. State, 114 So. 2d 348 (Fla.App.2d 1959); Sherman v. State, 255 So. 2d 263 (Fla.1971). . Kite v. State, 126 Fla. 77, 170 So. 445 (1936) ; Foy v. State, 115 Fla. 245, 155 So. 657 (1934) ; Jordan v. State, 171 So. 2d 418 (Fla.App.1st 1965) ; see, generally, 35 Fla.Jur., Witnesses, § 214 (p. 306). . Gluck v. State, 62 So. 2d 71 (Fla.1952).…

Authorities Cited

• Dade Nat'l Bank OF Miami v. Univ. Transfer & Storage, Inc., 151 So. 2d 868 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963)