FISH ET AL.

v.

KENNAMER, JUDGE

Citator

Cited By

• F. W. Woolworth Co. v. Carriker, 107 F.2d 689 (8th Cir. 1939)
  …Co. v. Dunkle, 8 Cir., 49 F. 2d 169, 171, certiorari denied 284 U.S. 622, 52 S.Ct. 9, 76 L.Ed. 531; Yelloway, Inc. v. Hawkins, 8 Cir., 38 F. 2d 731, 738; Security Life Ins. Company of America v. Brimmer, 8 Cir., 36 F. 2d 176, 178, certiorari denied 281 U.S. 744, 50 S.Ct. 350, 74 L.Ed. 1157. Plaintiff made no exceptions to the charge. Defendant made several exceptions to the charge but makes no challenge of the charge here. As to this Court on this appeal, the effect is the same as though no exceptions had…
• Bleecker v. Drury, 149 F.2d 770 (2d Cir. 1945)
  …into some charge properly considered as a libel per se, nevertheless the District Court correctly held them to be privileged. Plaintiff, relying on cases such as U. S. Smelting, Refining & Mining Co. v. Evans, 8 Cir., 35 F. 2d 459, certiorari denied 281 U.S. 744, 50 S.Ct. 350, 74 L.Ed. 1157, and Joseph H. Weiderhoff, Inc. v. Neal, D.C.W.D.Mo., 6 F.Supp. 798, contends that the proceeding before the Industrial Board was not a judicial proceeding, and that the material complained of is, therefore, actionable.…