HYLTON

v.

SOUTHERN RY. CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Clegg v. United States, 112 F.2d 886 (10th Cir. 1940)
  …ility arose. Clearly it was a decision on the merits and is a bar to the instant action. The judgment is affirmed. Henderson v. United States Radiator Corp., 10 Cir., 78 F. 2d 674, 675: Swift v. Jackson, 10 Cir., 37 F. 2d 237, 2t0, certiorari denied 281 U.S. 745, 50 S.Ct. 351, 74 L.Ed. 1158. Swift v. Jackson, supra, 10 Cir., 37 F. 2d at page 240; Gordon v. Ware Nat. Bank, 8 Cir., 132 F. 444, 449, 67 L.R.A. 550. Haney v. Neace Stark Co., 109 Or. 93, 216 P. 757, 219 P. 190, 191; Crow v. Abraham, 86 Or. 99,…
• Hylton v. S. Ry. Co., 87 F.2d 393 (5th Cir. 1937)
  …HAHN, District Judge. This is the second appearance of this case in this court. Our former decision is reported as Southern Railway Company v. Hylton, 37 F.(2d) 843 (certiorari denied 281 U.S. 745, 50 S.Ct. 351, 74 L.Ed. 1158). The facts as there stated will not be repeated here. At the last trial the District Judge directed a verdict in favor of the railway company. From a careful consideration of the testimony taken at the last trial, we f…
• Tatsumi Masuda v. Nagle, 55 F.2d 623 (9th Cir. 1932)
  …n while unlawfully in the United States. See Ewing Yuen v. Johnson, supra; In re Low Yin (D. C.) 13 F.(2d) 265, 266; Wong Gar Wah v. Carr (C. C. A. 9) 18 F.(2d) 250, 251; Kaichiro Sugimoto v. Nagle (C. C. A. 9), 38 F.(2d) 207, 209, certiorari denied 281 U. S. 745, 50 S. Ct. 351, 74 L. Ed. 1158. Appellant’s right to admission to the United States is governed by the Immigration Aet of 1924 and not by the Treaty of 1911. In Jeu Jo Wan v. Nagle, 9 F.(2d) 309, 310, this court said: “It will thus be seen that th…