CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RY. CO.
v.
COFFEY
CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RY. CO.
COFFEY
281 U.S. 749
Supreme Court of the United States (1930)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Balinovic v. Evening Star Newspaper Co., 113 F.2d 505 (D.C. Cir. 1940)…, 54 S.Ct. 528, 78 L.Ed. 1065. Whether the government should be responsible, as a private employer would be, in such cases as this, is for Congress to decide. Western Marine & Salvage Co. v. Ball, 59 App.D.C. 208, 37 F. 2d 1004, certiorari denied, 281 U.S. 749, 50 S.Ct. 353, 74 L.Ed. 1161. Standard Oil Co. v. Anderson, 212 U.S. 215, 221, 222, 29 S.Ct. 252, 254, 53 L.Ed. 480. When cars are loaned gratuitously, “the tendency is to hold that the chauffeur becomes the servant of the borrower.” 42 A.L.R. 144…
-
Ciejek v. Crane Serv. Co., Inc., 351 F.2d 788 (D.C. Cir. 1965)…aw v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 86 U.S.App.D.C. 86, 180 F. 2d 18 (1950). See Standard Oil Co., v. Anderson, 212 U.S. 215, 29 S.Ct. 252, 53 L.Ed. 480 (1909); and compare Western Marine & Salvage Co. v. Ball, 59 App.D.C. 208, 37 F. 2d 1004, cert. denied, 281 U.S. 749, 50 S.Ct. 353, 74 L.Ed. 1161 (1930), It is possible, of course, to discern some differences between the circumstances involved in the Haw and Poole cases, on the one hand, and those presented on the record before us, but we do not think these are of…