BUDLONG
v.
BUDLONG
BUDLONG
BUDLONG
281 U.S. 750
Supreme Court of the United States (1930)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
The First Nat'l Bank OF Clinton v. Vance Julian in Bankruptcy of Roby C. Woody, 383 F.2d 329 (8th Cir. 1967)…st be greater in value than the old securities and then a voidable preference may exist for the difference in value only. Walker v. Clinton State Bank, 216 F. 2d 165 (8 Cir. 1954); Blue v. Herkimer Nat. Bank, 37 F. 2d 663 (2 Cir. 1930), cert. denied 281 U.S. 750, 50 S.Ct. 354, 74 L.Ed. 1162; Schreiber v. Colt, 80 F. 2d 511 (10 Cir. 1935); 3 Collier on Bankruptcy, § 60.21. A renewal of a note by marking the old note “Paid” and using the proceeds of the new note to pay the old note, does not constitute prefe…
-
In re Trim-X, Inc., 695 F.2d 296 (7th Cir. 1982)…of which was less than the secured claim. See Textile Banking Co. v. Widener, 265 F. 2d 446 (4th Cir.1959); First Western Savings and Loan Ass’n v. Anderson, 252 F. 2d 544 (9th Cir.1958); Robinson v. Dickey, 36 F. 2d 147 (3d Cir.1929), cert. denied, 281 U.S. 750, 50 S.Ct. 354, 74 L.Ed. 1161 (1930); In re Atlantic Boat Builders Co., 5 Bankr.Ct.Dec. 128 (Bankr.M.D.Fla.1979). Such an award has also been allowed in a post-Code Chapter 11 proceeding. In re Hotel Associates, Inc., 6 B.R. 108 (Bkrtcy.E.D.Pa.1980)…
-
Donald Katz in Bankr. of Oakland Foundry Co. of Belleville v. The First Nat'l Bank OF Glen Head, 568 F.2d 964 (2d Cir. 1977)…ived the deposits in the regular course of business. E. g., Mayo v. Pioneer Bank & Trust Co., supra, 270 F. 2d at 834; Bank of Commerce v. Hatcher, 50 F. 2d 719 (4 Cir. 1931); Blue v. Herkimer National Bank, 30 F. 2d 256 (2 Cir. 1929), cert. denied, 281 U.S. 750 (1930); Elliotte v. American Savings Bank & Trust Co., 18 F. 2d 460, 462 (6 Cir. 1927); Bank of California v. Brainard, 3 F. 2d 3, 4 (9 Cir. 1925); In re Almond-Jones Co., 13 F. 2d 152, 156 [*971] (D.Md.1926), aff’d sub nom. Union Trust Co. v. Peck,…