COMMERCIAL UNION ASSURANCE CO.

v.

JASS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Price-Trawick, Inc. v. Gas Lift Corp., 101 F.2d 134 (5th Cir. 1939)
  …U.S. 405, 28 S.Ct. 748, 52 L.Ed. 1122; Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Mfg. Co., 243 U.S. 502, 37 S.Ct. 416, 61 L.Ed. 871, L.R.A.1917E, 1187, Ann.Cas.l918A, 959; Coulter v. Eagle & Phenix Mills, 5 Cir., 35 F. 2d 268, certiorari denied, 281 U.S. 758, 50 S.Ct. 409, 74 L.Ed. 1167; Bray v. Hofco Pump, 9 Cir., 93 F. 2d 804. Since it appears that appellee’s device does not infringe, the decree of the district court is Affirmed.…
• Wabash Corp. v. Ross Elec. Corp., 187 F.2d 577 (2d Cir. 1951)
  …t. It has long been the practice to treat non-infringement and invalidity as sufficient and alternative grounds for dismissing the complaint in a patent infringement suit. See Coulter v. Eagle & Phenix Mills, 5 Cir., 35 F. 2d 268, certiorari denied, 281 U.S. 758, 50 S.Ct. 460, 74 L.Ed. 1167. Cf. Altvater v. Freeman, 319 U.S. 359, 63 S.Ct. 1115, 87 L.Ed. 1450.” . They read: “1. Claims 1, 3, 4 and 10 of Korver patent No. 2,115,423, the filling device patent, are invalid over the prior art; daims 2, 5 and 6…

  ← 1 / 2 →