FIDELITY AND CASUALTY CO.
v.
HOWE
FIDELITY AND CASUALTY CO.
HOWE
281 U.S. 765
Supreme Court of the United States (1930)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Parker Precision Prods. Co. v. Metro. Life Ins. Co., 407 F.2d 1070 (3d Cir. 1969)…ge by the company and Lucarello of Parker’s heart condition in 1957 was irrelevant on the facts presented by this record. See Equitable Life Ass. Soc. v. New Horizons, Inc., supra. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Howe, 38 F. 2d 741 (3rd Cir.), cert. den. 281 U.S. 765, 50 S.Ct. 464, 74 L.Ed. 1173 (1930), and Robson v. Penna. Mutual Livestock Ins. Co., 57 Pa.Super. 491 (1914), cited by appellants, are inapposite, since they deal with whether unsigned applications containing alleged fraudulent statements are admiss…
-
Kilmer v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co., 45 F.2d 532 (4th Cir. 1930)…70, 373; Baltimore & O. Railroad Co. v. Baldwin (C. C. A.) 144 F. 53, 55; Chicago & E. I. Ry. Co. v. Divine (C. C. A.) 39 F.(2d) 537, 538. A recovery was sustained in the last ease on facts similar to the instant ease and writ of certiorari denied. 281 U. S. 765, 50 S. Ct. 464, 74 L. Ed. 1173. The Supreme Court passed on the question in Northern Pacific Railroad v. Freeman, 174 U. S. 379-381, 19 S. Ct. 763, 764, 43 L. Ed. 1014, in which Mr. Justice Brown, speaking for the court, says: “There was testimony…1 / 2
-
Ostrov v. Metro. Life Ins. Co., 379 F.2d 829 (3d Cir. 1967)…“insured”, not only by the terms of the policy, but also under § 318 and that he was also the “co-applicant” for the policy as that term is used in § 318. . Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York v. Howe, 38 F. 2d 741 (3 Cir. 1930), cert. denied 281 U.S. 765, 50 S.Ct. 464, 74 L.Ed. 1173 (1930); Ross v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, 403 Pa. 135, 169 A. 2d 74 (1961) and Syme v. Bankers National Life Insurance Company, 393 Pa. 600, 144 A. 2d 845 (1958), which are all cited by plaintiff in support of…