NEUSTADT ET AL.
v.
COLINE OIL CO. ET AL.
NEUSTADT ET AL.
COLINE OIL CO. ET AL.
282 U.S. 799
Supreme Court of the United States (1930)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Section 237 (a), Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for writ of certiorari, as required by § 237 (c), Judicial Code, as amended (43 Stat. 936, 938), certiorari is denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Louis K. Liggett Co. v. LEE, 288 U.S. 517 (U.S. 1933)…form, it seems clear that no corporation could successfully challenge its validity. Compare Horn Silver Mining Co. v. New York, 143 U. S. 305; Kansas City, F. S. & M. Ry. Co. v. Botkin, 240 U. S. 227; Nebraska ex rel. Beatrice Creamery Co. v. Marsh, 282 U. S. 799. And since the State had the power so to do, the mere failure to state that such was the nature of the exaction does not render it invalid. Compare Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U. S. 674, 683. Nor does the fact that the plaintiffs had been admitted to…
-
Newark Fire Ins. Co. v. State Bd. of Tax Appeals, 307 U.S. 313 (U.S. 1939)…137, 141; Swiss Oil Corp. v. Shanks, 273 U. S. 407, 413; Hellmich v. Hellman, 276 U. S. 233, 238; Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Emmerson, 277 U. S. 573; Educational Films Corp. v. Ward, 282 U. S. 379, 391; Nebraska ex rel. Beatrice Creamery Co. v. Marsh, 282 U. S. 799, 800; First Bank Stock Corp v. Minnesota, 301 U. S. 234, 237.…