GREAT NORTHERN RY. CO.
v.
DELMAR CO.
GREAT NORTHERN RY. CO.
DELMAR CO.
282 U.S. 836
Supreme Court of the United States (1931)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Deforest Radio Co. v. Gen. Elec. Co., 283 U.S. 664 (U.S. 1931)…Mb. Justice Stone delivered the opinion of the Court. Certiorari was granted, 282 U. S. 836, to review a judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, holding the Langmuir Patent, No. 1,558,436, granted October 20,1925, for “ electrical discharge apparatus and process of preparing and using the same,” valid, and infringed by peti…
-
Great N. Ry. Co v. Delmar Co., 283 U.S. 686 (U.S. 1931)…re Rose Co., 275 Fed. 409; Northern Pac. Ry Co. v. St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co., 4 F. (2d) 359. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings in conformity with this opinion. Reversed. 120 I. C. C. 530. 43 F. (2d) 780. 282 U. S. 836. U. S. C., Tit. 49, §4 (1).…
-
United States v. Williams, 417 F.2d 630 (10th Cir. 1969)…wide discretion in the conduct of the voir dire, Kreuter v. United States, 376 F. 2d 654 (10th Cir. 1967), cert. den. 390 U.S. 1015, 88 S.Ct. 1267, 20 L.Ed.2d 165 (1968), subject only to the essential demands of fairness, Aldridge v. United States, 282 U.S. 836, 51 S.Ct. 333, 75 L.Ed. 743 (1954). See also, Brundage v. United States, 365 F. 2d 616 (10th Cir. 1966).1 While it would indeed be appropriate, even desirable, to explain to the prospective jurors the significance of presumption of innocence and rea…