MANKE

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Las Vegas Merch. Plumbers Ass'n v. United States, 210 F.2d 732 (9th Cir. 1954)
  …2d 950, 952, the agents’ acts bind the appellants as principals. U. S. v. Perillo, 2 Cir., 1947, 164 F. 2d 645; U. S. v. Gooding, 1827, 12 Wheat. 460, 468, 469, 6 L.Ed. 693; Goldsmith v. U. S., 2 Cir., 1930, 42 F. 2d 133, 138, 139, certiorari denied 282 U.S. 837, •51 S.Ct. 26, 75 L.Ed. 743. Here there was clear evidence of the agency. The supposed distinction between the acts of a co-conspirator and those of an agent in a criminal case, is in reality one without a difference. The basic rule is that “the a…
• United States v. Baranski, 484 F.2d 556 (7th Cir. 1973)
  …ould defeat the obvious purpose of the legislation. Similarly, the defendant’s contention that the rule was applicable to restrict the meaning of “other writing” was rejected in Goldsmith v. United States, 42 F. 2d 133 (2d Cir. 1930), cert, denied, 282 U.S. 837, 51 S.Ct. 26, 75 L.Ed. 743. On the other hand,, in a civil case, Clarke v. Gold Dust Corp., 106 F. 2d 598 (3d Cir. 1939), cert, denied, 309 U.S. 671, 60 S.Ct. 614, 84 L.Ed. 1017 (1940), the court held that under the rule the phrase “or other corpor…
• United States v. Santos, 372 F.2d 177 (2d Cir. 1967)
  …nown and familiar principle of criminal jurisprudence, that he who commands or procures a crime to be done, if it is done, is guilty of the crime, and the act is his act. And see Goldsmith v. United States, 42 F. 2d 133, 139 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 282 U.S. 837, 51 S.Ct. 26, 75 L.Ed. 743 (1930); United States v. Campisi, 248 F. 2d 102, 105 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 892, 78 S.Ct. 266, 2 L.Ed.2d 191 (1957). This apparent discrimination is explained by the peculiar posture of the parties in a criminal…