FITZGERALD ET AL.
v.
UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS. CO.

U.S. | 1930-10-13
No. 469
282 U.S. 838 Supreme Court of the United States (1930) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …ction is no longer voidable by him. Section 1532. And unless the principal rescinds within a reasonable time after learning the true situation he is presumed to ratify. Fitzgerald v. Union Central L. Ins. Co., 8 Cir., 42 F. 2d 76, certiorari denied 282 U.S. 838, 51 S.Ct. 38, 75 L.Ed. 744. Consequently, it seems to us, there was nothing illegal in the transaction. If the agent had secretly procured commissions from the Government’s adversary, a different situation would arise, but there is no federal statu…
  • In re Underhill, 82 F.2d 257 (2d Cir. 1936)
    …nd business transactions might be ascertained. Intent to conceal the financial condition is no longer a necessary element to support an objection to a discharge for failure to keep books. Nix v. Sternberg, 38 F.(2d) 611 (C.C.A.8), certiorari denied 282 U.S. 838, 51 S.Ct. 20, 75 L.Ed. 744; In re Krulewitch, 60 F.(2d) 1039 (D.C.N.J.). The law is not unqualified in imposing a requirement to keep books or records, and it does not require that if they are kept they shall be kept in any special form of account…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw