NIX
v.
STERNBERG, TRUSTEE
NIX
STERNBERG, TRUSTEE
282 U.S. 838
Supreme Court of the United States (1930)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Grace Evangelical Church of S. Providence Ridge, 132 F.2d 460 (7th Cir. 1942)…ction is no longer voidable by him. Section 1532. And unless the principal rescinds within a reasonable time after learning the true situation he is presumed to ratify. Fitzgerald v. Union Central L. Ins. Co., 8 Cir., 42 F. 2d 76, certiorari denied 282 U.S. 838, 51 S.Ct. 38, 75 L.Ed. 744. Consequently, it seems to us, there was nothing illegal in the transaction. If the agent had secretly procured commissions from the Government’s adversary, a different situation would arise, but there is no federal statu…
-
In re Underhill, 82 F.2d 257 (2d Cir. 1936)…nd business transactions might be ascertained. Intent to conceal the financial condition is no longer a necessary element to support an objection to a discharge for failure to keep books. Nix v. Sternberg, 38 F.(2d) 611 (C.C.A.8), certiorari denied 282 U.S. 838, 51 S.Ct. 20, 75 L.Ed. 744; In re Krulewitch, 60 F.(2d) 1039 (D.C.N.J.). The law is not unqualified in imposing a requirement to keep books or records, and it does not require that if they are kept they shall be kept in any special form of account…